An Issue Mentioned Repeatedly

Lately, I haven't been bothered by world issues except for the Gaza conflict. Oh, and there's the first black President of the United States too, congratulations to him on stamping his name in the pages of history, I bet the future history textbooks would mention his name alot. It's amazing, who would've thought the US would be headed by a black guy but he has a lot of work to do, I wish him luck on that.

The word "boycott" is used much lately and even I was dragged into it, through discussion. My stand was, it's a bit too late to boycott anything and rather than wasting energy promoting and encouraging boycott, people should direct all that energy into supporting local brands or alternative brands.

I tried to picture the event from both sides: those who agree with the boycott and those who disagreed.

For those who agree with the boycott, their main reasons would be:
  1. Getting the message across, the war is a crime against humanity. Childrens are being killed, something must be done to put an end to this.
  2. For the Muslims, it is their "brothers" who are dying there, the Jews are oppressing the Muslims there.
  3. They sympathize with the innocent people who are unwillingly involved in the conflict.
  4. It stopped the apartheid in South Africa, then it could stop the war.
Those who disagree will say:
  1. Almost everything we use are from *insert name of country here*, we can't escape from them.
  2. Boycotting them will only affect our country!!! Our people would suffer because many of us work in their company!
  3. Why should we meddle in the conflict? It's none of our business, let them fight till the war ends!
  4. We shouldn't say or do anything about it, it would get us into trouble, do you want our country to have rain of bombs because of us trying to upset *insert country name here* economy?
  5. Boycotting *insert country name here* means you're supporting the opposition that's blowing themselves up!!!
  6. 1.6 billion Muslim population boycotting? Tell me, how many are actually living properly to even afford buy the products in the first place? (This is me being the devil's advocate)
I am against violence in any manner used on innocent civilians and especially children. No child should live through such trauma and atrocities.

I do not condone the act of Israel using their superior military power against a small group of rebels nor do I agree with the act of Hamas firing rockets.

I find it saddening whenever I discuss this issue, people would attack me for not looking at the Israelites side and supporting Hamas when I was only trying to reason out why people opt boycotting. I have always believed in delving into the views of both sides before giving my stand or opinion as I think it is only fair that everyone's view are taken into account.

My view on the conflict? I put both sides at fault, plus the Great Britain for their agreement with both the Arabs and Zionists which personally (there's no professionalism in here) I think, is the cause of all this. The Muslims should do like what the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did during his time, agreed to a truce even though the conditions were blatantly not in the Muslims favour. I think this was the Hudaibiyah agreement, if I'm not mistaken.

Like I've said before, people should focus their energy on promoting local brands or alternative brands at least and the local brands should take this to their advantage. Rather than saying "Boycott *insert name of country*!!!", they should instead say, "Buy local brands or use this products instead of *insert name of boycotted products*". The local brands should also consider a rebranding strategy, in my country, they are obviously targeting the Muslim consumers only with names like Safi, Najwa, etc, etc. They should widen their focus, I myself have used some of these local brands and they worked as fine as the international brands.

This rage of boycotting amongst MOST of the Muslim community are blind rage, they never did their research on the companies which were mentioned by various sources (and disputable ones too). I'm sure that more than 70% would resume using the boycotted products once the coverage on the conflict subsides. These people don't have a strategy for a systematic boycott and they forget that the Palestinians are comprised not only of Muslims but also other religions too, though their numbers have been greatly reduced since the past 60 years.

The non-muslims in my country, from those I've encountered, would care less about the conflict because it doesn't mean anything to them, even if it meant children being shot at. Why do this happen? It's the Muslims fault, they act as if this is a religous thing when it is not, and most of them label Jews as Zionists, gladly label them as pigs, curse them openly, damn them to hell, calling them the root of all evil and whatnot. This is the reason why the war will never end.

I will openly condemn them and tell them off when I see people condemning the Jews. The Jews have had their share of oppression, they were persecuted and hunted down during the anti-Semitic times and the Holocaust. It is the Zionist movement which are the ones governing Israel now (of whom should take the blame too) and they are only a minority in the Jewish community (uhh, I think so, I have to check again). People should not label the Jews as pigs and whatnot, they also condemn the act of the Zionists oppressing the Palestinians. The mindset of most of the Muslims in my country thinks that all Jews are at fault, which is very worrying so to speak.

The Muslims, who are the followers of the religion of peace should condemn all war, and not only the ones affecting their brethren. During the South Ossetia conflict, not many Muslims I know condemn the war, some didn't even know that it was happening. There weren't any funds raised for the South Ossetians, no posters going against the war, no demonstrations and this in a way, showed that Muslims only care for their own kin. This point has been used by many to attack the Muslims and I do think that Muslims should fix this issue.

Through various discussions, I've changed my stand to boycotting is not too late to be done but that we should focus more on developing local brands.

Hitherto, everyone should work towards peace and try to stop the war, taking sides will not work as the fault of this current conflict lies in both sides. People should think about the children, the mothers, the elderly, and the innocent civilians. They should think about humanity, this is no more an issue of religious differences, this is for the future of the generations to come. We do not want more children growing up in rubbles, we do not want children turning shrapnels and empty bullets into toys, we do not want more children fearing whether they could live through the day.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

2 Response to "An Issue Mentioned Repeatedly"

  1. Liz says:
    March 5, 2009 at 12:55 AM

    well.

    when all is said and all is done. it's a war.

    why talk about who's at fault when the energy should be channeled at stopping it peacefully?

    and well, i hate the word boycott. it's not a positive step towards betterment, it's a negative word that causes more negativity...

    and no, i don't seeing kids die either

  2. Nico says:
    March 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM

    I replied very late, sorry bout that.

    Like I said in my post, rather than saying boycotting the foreign products, it's better to promote local brands. No negativity in promoting our own brand now right?

    It's true about talking who's at fault when I could use that energy in another positive manner, it's just my personal view, can't help doing research and being curious.

    World peace is hard to achieve but doable. We could start by teaching kids to hate wars or show our disdain towards fighting openly.

    It'll catch up.